Month: August 2007 (Page 1 of 2)

Subtraction: A Man of Illegible Letters

Subtraction: A Man of Illegible Letters:

Oof. I had a look at my handwriting the other day, when I scribbled a note to accompany a package I was sending off. My chicken scratch looked horrible, nearly illegible, even. After years and years of keyboard use, my penmanship has clearly deteriorated.
It�s not that I write by hand so rarely that it was a shock for me to see how poorly formed my letters are. But I was writing at a moderately greater length than usual, and it made an impression on me how malformed many of the letters turned out. I had to go back in and add missing strokes and stems to many of the otherwise inscrutable letters just to make sure I didn�t come across as some kind of maniac.

Above: Letter by letter. A sample of my deteriorating penmanship. Points if you know where this passage of text came from.
I was also struck by

We Made This

We Made This:
We Made This
Beautiful Sci-Fi covers shock

We were strolling through Foyles the other day and stumbled across this stunning new Future Classics series from Gollancz, the science-fiction and fantasty arm of Orion Books.

The front covers are really startling in their boldness. No title. No author name. No publisher’s logo. Just fantastically striking and truly graphic images, combined with a great use of material and print process.

Of the three above, from left to right, Fairyland by Paul J McAuley uses a holographic foil and irridescent cover stock; The Separation by Christopher Priest uses an uncoated stock and a deboss; and Hyperion by Dan Simmons uses a spot varnish over black.

The spines and back covers have been given a series style with what looks like American Typewriter as the series typeface.

When you see what the previous cover was for Fairyland (below), you can see how radical a shift they’ve made. From a quick browse of a few online sci-fi forums it looks like existi

Olicana – On sale now | Typophile


Forums Projects Resources Typowiki News Membership Home » Forums » Critique » Script / Handwriting / Graffiti Olicana – On sale now Nick Cooke 17.Nov.2005 4.04am Hi typophiles, (or typenerds as my wife calls us), This is my first post inviting criticism of my design. I’m working on this informal script at the moment. I drew it with pen and ink first to get the thick/thin contrast, but I didn’t want it to look ’Dickensian’ – I’m trying to achieve a naturally flowing style without formal stiffness. I have completed the ’rough’ style, and I thought it might look pretty good as a smooth style – so that’s what I’m doing now. I’m also going to produce a more refined ’fine’ with as-thin-as-I-can-go thins style. At the moment it is Postscript, but I’m toying with the idea of contextual alternates in Opentype. The FontLab manual is no great help as I find it to be written from a programmers viewpoint, unfortunately I’m a designer and a lot of that stuff goes way over my head. I wish Leslie [From Olicana – On sale now | Typophile]

Type Trumps pack

Avant Garde Type Trump card Comic Sans card

Recent graduate of Cumbria University, Rick Banks, has created a set of Top Trumps style cards where classic typefaces are the subject matter – hence the name, Type Trumps. Each card is designed to make the most of the particular font it features, and typophiles will happily find such faces as Frankfurter, Times, Helvetica, Johnston Underground, Neu Alphabet in the pack. Type Trumps players can battle it out using such statistics as year of design, the amount of weights, cost etc to win their opponent’s cards. Banks has given each typeface a “rating” score, a “legibility” score and even a “special power”… For example, Clarendon beats Poppi on price but Poppi wins in the weights department – having nine over Clarendon’s three…

Here are some of our favourite cards from the pack…

Arete card Stripes Type Trump card

Various Type Trump cards

Type Trumps packshot

See more of the cards and Banks’ work, visit his website: www.face37.com and also find/buy some of his work on Blanka

[From Type Trumps pack]

Cast of Shadows

On numerous occasions I have turned on up an assignment and stood about scratching my head, trying to figure out how I am going to turn what I see in front of me into a picture. Not to say that the following technique is a gimmick. Far from it. If you try and pull this one off and get it wrong, it will, take my word for it, look abysmal. The use of shadows in pictures is not the first picture the wire photographer will shoot when turning up to an assignment, but if the light is right, and the light has definitely got to be right, it can turn an ordinary news conference, sporting situation, or political doorstep into an unusual picture. If pictures stand out and get noticed on the wire against the hundreds of others that are seen daily by the sub editors on the world’s picture desks,then half the battle is won. Graphic eye catching images always stand out, no matter how small the monitor’s thumbnail size.

Loathe as I am to fill a blog with my own pictures, here are a selection of photographs that I have taken in the last decade that hopefully illustrate the point.The first couple of sport pictures come from the beach volleyball at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. It was the first time the sport had been included unofficially in an Olympics and was set on Bondi beach The potential for pictures was huge and with the light at midday and sunset being equally effective for shadows, both these pictures were possible.

beachvolley1

beachvolley2

The next news picture involved a lengthy doorstep in Downing Street where the story also required a security picture.This was lit with television lights where every half hour the policeman would pace up and down the street, passing the door for a split second. This took many attempts before getting it right. The second picture was shot at a mass grave in Iraq where the shadow of the pointing hand was completetly fortuitous.

copper1
iraq1

These three press conference pictures show Microsoft supremo Bill Gates, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak Britain’s then Chancellor Gordon Brown in action, lit again with daylight television lights.
gates1
barakkkkbrown1

All these are not to be confused with the final entertainment picture. This is Noel Gallagher of Oasis performing at the Brit Awards in London. This is a silhouette. And this is another story.
noel1

[From Cast of Shadows]

Less is more!

Some people say that radio has the best pictures, because the listener creates the visuals in his/her head. A still image leaves nothing to the imagination – or does it?
Of course there are many factors that create a compelling photograph, but there is a type of picture that can only be described as minimalist, because it gives just enough visual information for the viewer to create the rest of the scene in the imagination. Basically, the photographer shows a detail that gives an impression of the whole. The picture entices us not with what we can see, but with what has been left out.

This might seem easy. For example, I could shoot a leaf lying on the floor with the aim of triggering an image of a tree in the viewer’s mind. But it doesn’t quite work like that. For a start, a leaf lying by itself wouldn’t trigger the image of a tree; there would need to be an extra factor. In addition these pictures rarely work unless there is a human element, however tenuous, to bring the picture to life. Finally, the leaf picture would be very dull. The successful minimalist photograph needs to be a compelling photograph in its own right, through the elements contained within it or the composition.

Like many areas of photography there is no formula, because every situation is different. Success will rely on the photographers’ power of observation to spot detail in a context that creates exactly the right links, giving the viewer a spark to fire the imagination.

Hands

Close up pictures of hands are often used to give an impression of the whole person or a situation, but wouldn’t work with any old pair of hands. David Gray’s photograph, above, demonstrates this very well. A Chinese worker with his hands behind his back pauses while working on a railway link for next year’s Olympics. The gloves are so tattered, and his fingers so grimy, that they tell us how hard the man works and because he seems to be overdue a new pair of gloves we are given a clue about his working conditions.

obama.jpg

This type of image doesn’t necessarily need a human body part to actually be in the picture. In Lee Celano’s picture above, showing the shadow of democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama at a public meeting, we can’t see the man himself, but because he is holding a microphone it is immediatley clear that he is addressing an audience . The atmosphere is increased by the distorting effect on his hand by the curtain, as it appears to creep tantalisingly towards the hand of the secret service agent, which itself is a detail to further fire the imagination.

dancer.jpg

Shadows tend to be a recurring theme in this type of photograph. Brian Snyder’s photograph shows a youngster using dance to develop self-esteem, creative expression and imagination. The image is reinforced by the leg dropping in from the top of the picture, and the two elements work together to help us create our own picture of the part of the scene that falls outside the frame of the photograph.

iraq.jpg

Damir Sagolj’s photograph of a US soldier patrolling in Baghdad doesn’t need additional information as the shadow is so detailed. The seemingly deserted street works with the shadow and effectively conveys a sinister atmosphere. This gives us an impression of the fear felt on those streets, whether it is felt by the soldier or the local people. This impression is much more powerful for being left to our imagination. Also note the composition, and the way the eye is drawn from the right of the picture to the left by the direction of the weapon and the white barriers.

woods.jpg

Sometimes the familiarity of the person in the picture is essential for us to make sense of it, such as this photograph by Jessica Rinaldi, showing a silhouette of a figure we instantly recognize as Tiger Woods. But the story is told by the body language, which suggest that Woods is not having a good day. The shaft of the club adds the finishing touch to the image.

Shields

The image above by Yannis Behrakis, of Israeli security forces taking cover behind their shields during clashes in the West Bank city of Hebron, would have been a meaningless still life picture of shields if it wasn’t for the hand, introducing the human element into the picture and bringing it to life. But the hand makes the picture appear forlorn, and we are left to draw our own conclusions about what is happening out of sight below the transparent part of the shield.

Volleyball

This photograph by Pascal Lauener, of a beach volleyball game between the US and South Africa, is nothing more than three hands and a ball. But because of the positioning of the hands and fingers, and the straining muscles, we know that the players are competing ferociously and it’s easy to imagine the action taking place beneath the hands.

Helmets

Finally, as an exception to the human element rule, this well observed and well shot photograph by Darren Staples, of the helmets belonging to members of the Indian cricket team sitting on the field during the fourth day of the second test match against England, gives very little away, and leaves so much to our imagination. Are the players having a break? Why did they place their helmets in a line?

[From Less is more!]

When will the Mac blogosphere stop thinking it’s always right?

http://www.technovia.co.uk/2007/08/when-will-the-mac-blogosphere-stop-thinking-its-always-right.html

I actually couldn’t imagine any circumstances when I could have written a better paragraph than this one from Charles Arthur:

“The fact is that, not to be rude, you don’t get journalism. It is not the same as deciding you know what someone thinks. The blogosphere thinks it knows stuff. It ‘knew’ there would be an iPhone API. It ‘knew’ Apple wouldn’t use Intel chips. (Remember?) The Wall Street Journal didn’t turn to the blogosphere on the latter to find out the truth. And so it got the correct story first.”
The point about Intel chips is pretty close to my heart. For years, my friend Matthew Rothenberg was pilloried by the Mac blogosphere for his story on Marklar, the project – initiated in 2001 – to port Mac OS X to Intel. I knew Matthew was right and the blogosphere was wrong, because I know Matthew and what a fine journalist he is.Yet the constant abuse Matthew took from Mac fans who knew categorically that Apple would never move to Intel was, in my opinion, disgusting and something which many of those blow-hards have never apologised for. Even smart Mac observers like John Gruber were adamant that Apple would not move, because there was no efficient PowerPC emulator for Intel. In fact, of course, there was just such an emulator being developed by a company in Manchester called Transitive. Some journalists were, even at this point, on to Transitive – I spoke to Think Secret’s Nick dePlume about trying to get a handle on what Transitive was doing back in 2003, but neither of us could nail down enough information to get a story out of it.
The fact was, Matthew was right and the naysayers were wrong – and the reason that he was right because, instead of assuming he knew what was happening and writing some kind of “educated opinion” column, Matthew did the research, made the calls, talked to the right sources and got the confirmation that he needed to run with his story. He didn’t “know” that Apple wouldn’t move to Intel – and that’s why he got the best scoop in Mac journalism in the past ten years.
And that, in short, is the difference between a blogger and a journalist. If you’re asking questions of people and writing on the basis of their answers, you’re a journalist. If you’re writing based on what you think you know, you’re a blogger.
[From When will the Mac blogosphere stop thinking it’s always right?] (Ian Betteridge / Technovia)

« Older posts

© 2025 stefpause.com

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑